Outcomes of lumbar discectomy in outpatients and inpatients in terms of pain, complications and readmission requirement in a university hospital in Bogotá D.C., Colombia

Authors

  • Frank Mario Herrera-Mendez Clínicas Colsanitas, Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Orthopedics Service, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. | Clínicas Colsanitas, Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Surgical Service, Spine Surgery Specialty, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6415-7563
  • Madeline Rossana Bilbao-Rodas Clínicas Colsanitas, Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Orthopedics Service, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. | Clínicas Colsanitas, Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Surgical Service, Spine Surgery Specialty, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-5209
  • Geraldine Álvarez-Archila Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Orthopedics and Trauma Specialty Program, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-8199
  • Sofía Muñoz-Medina Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Research Unit, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8038-298X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58814/01208845.50

Keywords:

Spinal Diseases, Hernia, Laminectomy, Diskectomy, Ambulatory Care

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar discectomy is the most common spine surgery.

Objective: To describe the outcomes of lumbar discectomy in adults in terms of pain, presence of complications, and readmission requirement.

Methodology: Retrospective observational study conducted in 101 patients <75 years old undergoing lumbar discectomy (laminectomy, foraminotomy, and/or lumbar microdiscectomy) between January 2014 and December 2021 at a university hospital in Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) 7 days after the procedure, while the presence of complications and the need for readmission were assessed up to 30 days postoperatively. In addition, a bivariate analysis (Student's T, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher's exact tests) was performed to determine differences in the variables considered according to the presence of postoperative complications and readmission requirements.

Results: Patients' mean age was 41.88 years (SD: 12.6). Median bleeding and operative time were 30mL (IQR: 20-50) and 63 minutes (IQR: 60 - 76), respectively. The median VAS score was 1 (IQR: 1) and 51 patients showed an improvement in pain level of 100%. Three patients had to be readmitted due to deep vein thrombosis (n=1), pain (n=1), or dyspnea (n=1). There were no reoperations or mortality at 30 days postoperatively.

Conclusion: Low rates of complications and hospital readmission were observed in the present study. Since no deaths or reoperation were reported, it is possible to state that this is a safe surgical procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Casey E. Natural History of Radiculopathy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22(1):1-5. https://doi.org/fntbzq.

Hernández J, Moreno C. Medicina del dolor. 1st edition. Bogotá D.C.: Editorial Universidad del Rosario; 2005.

Linhares D, Fonseca JA, Ribeiro da Silva M, Conceição F, Sousa A, Sousa-Pinto B, et al. Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021;19(1):1-11. https://doi.org/mbg9.

Amin RM, Andrade NS, Neuman BJ. Lumbar Disc Herniation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(4):507-16. https://doi.org/gmhh6d.

Rahmathulla G, Kamian K. Lumbar Disc Herniations ‘To Operate or Not’ Patient Selection and Timing of Surgery. Korean J Spine. 2014;11(4):255-7. https://doi.org/mbhb.

Arts MP, Peul WC, Koes BW, Thomeer RT; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study (SIPS) Group. Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in the Netherlands: A survey among spine surgeons. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9(1):32-9. https://doi.org/c3cfgn.

Varela-Hernández A, Mosquera-Betancourt CG, Pardo-Camacho G, Suárez-Monne D, Hernández-Cabezas I. Seguridad la práctica de la discectomía lumbar bajo régimen ambulatorio. AMC. 2012;16(2):143-52.

Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):264-71. https://doi.org/f4ndvt.

Best NM, Sasso RC. Success and safety in outpatient microlumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(5):334-7. https://doi.org/dt2np5.

An HS, Simpson JM, Stein R. Outptient laminectomy and Discectomy. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12(3):192-6.

Jaiswal A, Kumar S, Reddy S, Jaiswal P. Feasibility and safety of outpatient lumbar microscopic discectomy in a developing country. Asian Spine J. 2019;13(5):721-9. https://doi.org/mbhm.

World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: 64th WMA General Assembly; 2013.

Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 8430 de 1993 (octubre 4): Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Bogotá D.C.; octubre 4 de 1993 [Cited 2023 Jan 26]. Available from: https://bit.ly/31gu7do.

Lang SS, Chen HI, Koch MJ, Kurash L, McGill-Armento KR, Palella JM, et al. Development of an outpatient protocol for lumbar discectomy: Our institutional experience. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(5):897-901. https://doi.org/f6twkq.

Griffith H, Marks C. Outpatient surgery for prolapsed lumbar disc. Br J Neurosurg. 1987;1(1):105-109. https://doi.org/dm624r.

Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: An analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):264-71. https://doi.org/f4ndvt.

Debono B, Sabatier P, Garnault V, Hamel O, Bousquet P, Lescure JP, et al. Outpatient Lumbar Microdiscectomy in France: From an Economic Imperative to a Clinical Standard-An Observational Study of 201 Cases. World Neurosurg [Internet]. 2017;106:891-7. https://doi.org/mbpz.

Linhares D, Fonseca JA, Ribeiro da Silva M, Conceição F, Sousa A, Sousa-Pinto B, et al. Cost effectiveness of outpatient lumbar discectomy. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021;19(1):1-11. https://doi.org/mbg9.

Mundell BF, Gates MJ, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Freedman BA, Nassr A, et al. Does patient selection account for the perceived cost savings in outpatient spine surgery? A meta-analysis of current evidence and analysis from an administrative database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(6):687-95. https://doi.org/mbp2.

Best NM, Sasso RC. Outpatient Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in Adolescent Patients: Long-Term Follow-up Study. 2010;4:2-5.

Vaidya R, Carp J, Bartol S, Ouellette N, Lee S, Sethi A. Lumbar Spine Fusion in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(5):495-500. https://doi.org/c4j8x7.

Yadla S, Malone J, Campbell PG, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, et al. Obesity and spine surgery: reassessment based on a prospective evaluation of perioperative complications in elective degenerative thoracolumbar procedures. Spine J. 2010;10(7):581-7. https://doi.org/ccx7zz.

Rosen DS, Ogden AT. Clinical studies obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(5):956-60. https://doi.org/dnzp5c.

Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Mirza SK, Heagerty PJ, Comstock BA, et al. Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(17):1957-63. https://doi.org/bpgqcg.

Snyder SK, Hamid KS, Roberson CR, Rai SS, Bossen AC, Luh JH, et al. Outpatient Thyroidectomy Is Safe and Reasonable: Experience with More than 1,000 Planned Outpatient Procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(5):575-84. https://doi.org/bwqqds.

Villavicencio AT, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, Thramann JJ. The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J. 2007;7(2):148-53. https://doi.org/d6jggq.

Bekelis K, Missios S, Kakoulides G, Rahmani R, Simmons N. Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states. Spine J. 2014;14(9):1944-50. https://doi.org/f2tpbz.

Gonzalez-Castro A, Shetty A, Nagendar K, Greenough CG. Day-case conventional discectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(1):67-70. https://doi.org/d7zmx8.

Liu L, Li N, Wang Q, Wang H, Wu Y, Jin W, et al. Iatrogenic Lumbar Artery Injury in Spine Surgery: A Literature Review. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:266-71. https://doi.org/mbp4.

Valencia AW, Husbands-Luque JS. Tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio: grave riesgo prevenible. Rev. Col. Anest. 2011;38(4):499-507.

Goacher E, Sanders MI, Ivanov M. Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following lumbar decompression surgery: A systematic review. Brain Spine. 2022;2:100888. https://doi.org/mbp6.

Pendharkar AV, Shahin MN, Ho AL, Sussman ES, Purger DA, Veeravagu A, et al. Outpatient spine surgery: defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;44(5):E11. https://doi.org/gdjf3b.

Sivaganesan A, Hirsch B, Phillips FM, McGirt MJ. Spine Surgery in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting: Value-Based Advancement or Safety Liability? Neurosurgery. 2018;83(2):159-65. https://doi.org/mbp7.

Basques BA, Ferguson J, Kunze KN, Phillips FM. Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(Suppl. 2):S174-S180. https://doi.org/mbp8.

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

1.
Herrera-Mendez FM, Bilbao-Rodas MR, Álvarez-Archila G, Muñoz-Medina S. Outcomes of lumbar discectomy in outpatients and inpatients in terms of pain, complications and readmission requirement in a university hospital in Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Rev. colomb. ortop traumatol. [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 1 [cited 2024 May 20];37(4):e50. Available from: https://revistasccot.org/index.php/rccot/article/view/50

Issue

Section

Original research
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo