Situación actual de los bancos de tejidos en Colombia: tejido osteomuscular

William Ferney Montaña-Chaparro; Katty Alexandra Díaz-Roa; Elkin Hernán Otálvaro-Cifuentes

doi:10.1016/j.rccot.2020.06.006

Authors

William Ferney Montaña-Chaparro INVIMA
Katty Alexandra Díaz-Roa INVIMA
Elkin Hernán Otálvaro-Cifuentes INVIMA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rccot.2020.06.006

Keywords:

tissue bank, tissue donors, tissue transplantation

Abstract

Background: The bone is the second most transplanted tissue in humans. Orthopaedists and Dentists are the main professionals that use it in their procedures. The aim of this study was to describe the activity of the certified musculoskeletal tissue banks in Colombia.
Methodology: The extraction, processing, storage, distribution, and production capacity of musculoskeletal tissues donated to each Tissue Bank were evaluated using a questionnaire completed via teleconference. The information was supplemented with records of management certification of Good Practices, Invima registers, and information provided by the NHI (Colombian National Health Institute) statistics reported by tissue banks each month.
Results: The processed tissue comes from forensic donors (77%), IPS health care institutions (5%), and 17% from living donors. Donor age was 45 to 70 years, depending on whether it was structural tissue, gender, and condition of live / dead donor. Technologies for microbiological control varied, with aseptic processing, antibiotics, and gamma radiation being found. The final products offered are fresh tissue, lyophilised, pulverised, decalcified, and demineralized bone matrix. The maximum storage period found was 5 years. It is estimated that 67 tissue units could be obtained from each donor in Colombia.
Discussion: Technological development of Colombian musculoskeletal Tissue Banks is of the highest international standards, being able to meet the varied demand for domestic products necessary for all related medical fields. However, it was identified that there was a lag in the distribution process, as well as in usability and taking advantage of the availability, and use of tissues from donors.
Evidence Level: IV

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

William Ferney Montaña-Chaparro, INVIMA

Epidemiólogo Clínico, MSc Bioestadística Profesional Especializado, INVIMA.

Katty Alexandra Díaz-Roa, INVIMA

Bacterióloga y Laboratorista, Esp. Gerencia en Laboratorios Profesional Especializado, INVIMA.

Elkin Hernán Otálvaro-Cifuentes, INVIMA

Esp Gerencia de Salud Pública, MSc Seguridad Pública Director Dispositivos Médicos y Otras Tecnologías, INVIMA.

References

Sepúlveda M, Meneses P, Wevar O. Guias Clínicas Sociedad Chilena de Trasplantes. Capitulo XVI: Trasplante De Tejidos Músculo-Esqueléticos. 2010, http://www.sociedaddetrasplante.cl/utilidades/biblioteca/section/9-guias-clinicas-sociedad-chilena-de-trasplante.html.

Mesa AC, Manent RB, Canto MP, Sabatier CA. Banco de tejido óseo congelado para trasplante. Investigaciones Medicoquirúrgicas. 2012;1:34-41.

San Julián M, Valenti A. Trasplante óseo Gobierno de Navarra. Departamento de Salud. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra. 2006;29:125-36. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272006000400012

FDA. Guidance for Industry Eligibility Determination for Donors of Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. 2007.

American Association of Tissue Banks Standards for Tissue Banking.14th Edition. In Library of Congress Card 2016;84- 7269:38-56.

Mickevicius T, Pockevicius A, Kucinskas A, Gudas R, Maciulaitis J, Noreikaite A, Usas A. Impact of storage conditions on electromechanical, histological and histochemical properties of osteochondral allografts. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2015;16:314. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0776-y

Glowacki J. Demineralized bone and BMPs: Basic science and clinical utility. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015;73:S126-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.009

Nguyen H, Morgan DA, Forwood MR. Sterilization of allograft bone: is 25 kGy the gold standard for gamma irradiation? Cell and tissue banking. 2007;8:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-006-9019-7

Kayurapan A, Aresanasuwan T, Waikakul S. Decreasing strength of bone allograft after recovery and preservation. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand=Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2009;92:S76-80.

Cornu O. Influence of Freeze-Drying and Irradiation on Mechanical Properties of Human Cancellous Bone: Application to Impaction Bone Grafting, Bone Grafting, Dr Alessandro Zorzi (Ed.). 2012:41-48 doi:10.5772/32811. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/bone-grafting/influence-of-freeze-drying-and-irradiation-on-mechanicalproperties-of-cancellous-bone-application-t. https://doi.org/10.5772/32811

Hernandez C. lradiation does Not modify Mechanical Properties of cancellous bone under compression y REY, L. and MAY. J.C. Freeze Drying /Lyophilízationof Pharmaceutical and Biological Products Third Edition. 2012.

Varaona JM, Basso MF. Obtención y utilización de injertos óseos de donantes vivos. Revista Médica UIS. 2012;23(3.).

Posada JA, Benavides CR, Monsalve PA, Osorio A. Injertos óseos-Nueva alternativa. Fase I. Extracción de proteínas morfogenéticas parcialmente purificadas de hueso bovino. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 2003;16:139-46.

Dasso G, Fernández MS, Arias JL. Reparación ósea mediante aloimplantes sometidos a diferentes métodos de conservación en conejos. Archivos de medicina veterinaria. 1998;30: 57-66.

Ameigeiras EV, Gil-Loyzaga PE. Criopreservación de células y tejidos Cultivo de Células animales y humanas. Aplicaciones en medicina regenerativa. 2013;1:103. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X1998000200006